Downtown the Best Option for the NFL in LA
Rendering of Farmers Field in Downtown LA |
This past week, a 10,000 page
environmental impact report (EIR) was published for the proposed Farmers Field
stadium in Downtown Los Angeles. This
was a major step forward for a project that is the best option for the NFL to
return to LA. While there is a competing
project in the City of Industry and some people have named Dodger Stadium as an
ideal place for a stadium, Farmers Field makes the most sense for the
region.
The
EIR told us much of what we already knew, in the brevity of 17 volumes. There will be traffic going to games. Guess what, there is traffic at every stadium
in America. It once took me 2 and a half
hours to get off the freeway and into the parking lot at Qualcomm Stadium in
San Diego. That stadium is located in
the suburbs and is surrounded by freeways.
The
report estimates that 19,000 cars will enter the area for games and that 18
percent of ticket buyers will use public transportation to get to the
stadium. These estimates were met by a
typical Angeleno response – “That’s not enough parking spaces!” and “we have
public transportation in this city?”
The
fact is that the Downtown and the City of Industry projects stand in direct
contrast. The City of Industry proposal
is what people in Los Angeles are comfortable with. It is a stadium located in the suburbs,
surrounded by parking lots, and easily accessible by freeway. It is also a stadium that will likely be
irrelevant outside of the 8 weekends a year that it is used for football. Farmers Field, on the other hand, follows an
ideology that would be welcomed in Europe.
It is in a dense location. It is
easily accessible by public transit. It
is also going to be an event center that is flexible enough to host conventions
and even basketball games.
The
City of Industry site may be the stadium that Angelenos want, but Farmers Field
is truly what this city needs. It will
be a stadium that can help to change Los Angeles from a suburban, car loving
culture to a place that embraces urbanism and public transportation. When people go somewhere in Los Angeles,
their first thoughts are often “what freeway do I need to take?” and “how much
traffic will there be?” While this
thought process is fine for an excursion to San Diego, it is unsustainable for
trips that are only a few miles away.
Many of my friends and family members don’t even know that LA has a
subway. They are also completely
unfamiliar with the concept of light rail.
Several studies have shown that Los Angeles is actually the densest
region in the United States. That’s
right, by some metrics LA is actually more crowded than New York.
The
problem is that we’re still acting like we live in the suburbs created here in
the 1950’s. We need to embrace our density, and Farmers Field
can help us do that. Increasing the
population around Downtown, near all the light rail and subway lines, would
help people erase the idea that this city is too spread out. It would also put pressure on the city to
keep improving and expanding its mass transit system.
The
City of Industry and possibly even Dodger Stadium could be fine places for an
NFL team to someday play. However,
Farmers Field has the potential to do something special for this city. When people out of state see it on
television, instead of thinking “what beautiful suburbs and parking lots” they
will instead think “wow, Los Angeles is starting to look like New York.” The major concerns for this stadium –
parking, traffic, financing – are issues for any stadium in this country.
It will be great
when a professional team takes the field once again representing Los
Angeles. However, the cultural changes
associated with Farmers Field could be much more valuable to this region than
any football team.
The field should definitely be built downtown. The City of Industry project was a good idea, but it will be so much more lucrative downtown. More money in AEG's pockets.
ReplyDeleteWhile I think you are absolutely right about Farmer's field being a great way to bring more public transportation into this city, I don't think that should be a major motivation to build this stadium. I think the city of Los Angeles needs to increase effective public transportation options regardless. Many of my comments on this class' blogs have been about using what we already have instead of inventing something new. There is such a mindset of progression and technology that when any problem crops up we think about whole new ways to solve it. What about using what we already have? There are tons of people in Los Angeles that bike. How could we make this city more bike friendly? How could we incentivize the bike riders? How might we be able to incentivize carpooling? Just because answers to these problems in the past haven't worked doesn't mean we should go out and look for the next best thing. We have the ideas already, we just need to do some trial and error on how to implement them.
ReplyDelete