The NFL Uses LA as Bait Once Again


This past week, Minnesota lawmakers voted against a proposed stadium for the Minnesota Vikings.  The Vikings current stadium, the Metrodome, has been in disrepair for the past decade or so and the team has been lobbying for a new facility.  Soon after this decision by the legislature, NFL commissioner Roger Goodell flew in to St. Paul to remind them that Los Angeles doesn’t have a team.  That same day, Vikings owner Zygi Wilf’s jet was spotted in LA.  Sure enough, the legislature got a potential stadium deal back on track the next day.
The Metrodome after its roof collapsed in a snowstorm
There is very little argument against the fact that the Vikings need a new stadium.  However, the NFL is once again exerting its influence to get cities and states to put up public money to aid billion-dollar franchises.  You can’t exactly blame the NFL for this; they are simply doing what is best for the league and its franchises. 

But you can blame the public sector for falling for the trick once again.  The Vikings are beloved in the state of Minnesota.  They have a strong, passionate fan base that has supported the team through thick and thin.  For most of these people, the idea of the Vikings moving seems preposterous.  Thus, when reality set in this week that the team could possibly move to Los Angeles, the lawmakers quickly woke up to ensure that the team will stay. 

Once again, however, the Los Angeles market is being used as a pawn to help other cities.  This has been the case since the Rams and the Raiders left in 1994; every time a team needs a new stadium, the owner’s jet can shows up at LAX to freak out the lawmakers back home and have them fork over truckloads of cash. 

This isn’t fair to Los Angeles and it isn’t fair to governments around the country.  It sometimes seems like the LA market is more valuable to the NFL if it is left open (to use as leverage) than if it actually had a team.  As a result, the governments make stadium deals with public dollars that they typically can’t afford. 
Proposed Vikings stadium in Downtown Minneapolis
I’m not saying that governments shouldn’t spend any money on stadiums – these are extremely expensive buildings that do provide a benefit to their cities.  I am saying, however, that cities need to hold the teams responsible to pay the majority of the costs. 

By subsidizing the bill for a stadium, the team actually becomes less connected to the city.  Let’s say I decided to build you a new house in Minneapolis, because I think that you are valuable to the city.  You’re so valuable to the city that I’m only going to charge you $1,000 a year in rent.  You’re also a good negotiator, so you work out a lease that allows you to leave after 10 years.  After these 10 years are up, why would you stay in Minneapolis unless the city decides to build you a new house?  You weren’t making huge payments for the house over the 10 years and you don’t own anything when the lease runs up.  Simply, it would make the most sense for you to threaten to move elsewhere, unless the city builds you an entirely new house and once again foots the bill.  Governments need to realize that they are working against their best interests when they make these deals to “ensure” that teams don’t move to Los Angeles.
Farmers Field and the City of Industry Stadium - bait for NFL teams to threaten to move

Comments

  1. Bowler BoyApril 23, 2012 at 9:59 AM

    Agreed. There is far too much emphasis placed on the importance of sports teams, and frankly, it's not even the actual team that is at fault, it's the owner of the team. Corporate greed is an awful thing to see, the fact that corporations are able to use these tactics to enforce their will on the government is a sickening thing. Money that could be going to economic stimulus, to healthcare, to hospitals, to roads, to infrastructure, to schooling ends up going to over sized play grounds.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

An Alternative Design for USC's Coliseum Renovation

Image
I recently wrote a rambling, 2,000 word, mostly critical review of USC’s proposal to renovate the Los Angeles Memorial Coliseum. However, it isn’t fair to simply sit back and criticize carefully-thought out plans without giving feasible suggestions. There have been many Coliseum renovation plans presented before, but the vast majority have been entirely unrealistic or too expensive . In addition, previous plans haven’t viewed the Coliseum in the same way that the USC Athletic Department seemingly does - as a historic stadium in need of a general facelift and a few modern amenities. Thus, I set out to create an alternative that accomplishes everything that USC’s proposal does, but in a more aesthetically pleasing and flexible way. *I should note that I’m not an architect. I am someone who has traveled to see approximately 70 professional and college stadiums and who has a near-encyclopedic memory of hundreds of stadiums around the world. My drawings may not be 100% to scale, bu...
Read more

Coliseum Renovation Plans Leaked

Image
I was messing around with the url on  coliseumrenovation.com  tonight and I was able to get to the pages with updated renderings for the Coliseum renovation plan. USC is expected to officially release these in the next week or two, but you can get an early look here.  I feel like the reaction when the original plans were released in October was mixed at best. If you didn't like the plans then, you're going to be disappointed, as it appears that there have been virtually no changes. I took screenshots from  http://coliseumrenovation.com/overview  and posted them below.  I'll have a follow-up post with some commentary in the near future. If you're new to the blog, you can see my alternative renovation plans  here  and  here . Legal Talk: These images technically belong to USC and came from the url mentioned above. I make no claims of owning these images. New rendering of "The Scholarship Club Tower." Image from http://colise...
Read more